Michael Tokarev wrote:
Can't the argument be something like u64 instead of struct timespec, regardless of this discussion (relative vs absolute)?
Newer syscalls (ppoll, pselect) take struct timespec, which is a reasonable, modern form of the timeout argument...
Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [take24 0/6] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [take24 0/6] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [take24 0/6] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [take24 0/6] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [take24 0/6] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [take24 0/6] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [take24 0/6] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [take24 0/6] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [take24 0/6] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
- From: Michael Tokarev <[email protected]>
- [take24 0/6] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
- Prev by Date: Re: smbfs (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2))
- Next by Date: Re: arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c(124): remark #593: variable "bootmap_size" was set but nev
- Previous by thread: Re: [take24 0/6] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
- Next by thread: Re: [take24 0/6] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
- Index(es):
 |