Re: [PATCH]: first proposal for pci resume quirk interface

Alan wrote:
> --- linux.vanilla-2.6.19-rc5-mm1/arch/i386/pci/fixup.c	2006-11-10 10:38:25.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm1/arch/i386/pci/fixup.c	2006-11-14 15:13:03.000000000 +0000
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
>  #define VIA_8363_KL133_REVISION_ID 0x81
>  #define VIA_8363_KM133_REVISION_ID 0x84
>  
> -static void __devinit pci_fixup_via_northbridge_bug(struct pci_dev *d)
> +static void pci_fixup_via_northbridge_bug(struct pci_dev *d)
>  {
>  	u8 v;
>  	u8 revision;

I sent a similar patch about one year ago and it was rejected back then.
Any reasons why fixups on resume suddenly are desirable?
(I agree with the patch wholehartedly and will test it ASAP on my
Samsung P35 laptop which needs the asus_hides_smbus quirk.)

Regards,
Carl-Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH]: first proposal for pci resume quirk interface
    • From: Alan <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH]: first proposal for pci resume quirk interface
    • From: Alan <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/4] WorkStruct: Typedef the work function prototype
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH]: first proposal for pci resume quirk interface
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH]: first proposal for pci resume quirk interface
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH]: first proposal for pci resume quirk interface
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]