Alan Stern wrote:
> The real issue here is the way ieee1394 sets up children of devices with
> no driver. On the face of it that is quite illogical: If a device has no
> driver, then who can interrogate it to find out about its children?
Perhaps I should turn this dummy driver into an actual representation of
ieee1394 or ieee1394's nodemgr.
> USB faces a similar situation. In a USB device, all the real work is
> actually done by "interfaces". So we set up a device structure for the
> USB device itself, plus device structures for each of its interfaces. The
> parent structure is bound to a (more or less) dummy driver, which insures
> that the child structures are deleted whenever it gets unbound.
I will eventually more thoroughly look at how USB and other subsystems
with device hierarchies do it.
> Still, maybe some compromise can be reached. Perhaps Dmitry's idea, or
> something like it, can be adopted.
Thanks for the input of both of you.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-==- =-== =-=-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]