David Brownell wrote:
A fine example of two platform-specific notions. First, that GPIO signals
are muxed in that way ... they could easily have dedicated pins!! Second,
that there's even a one-to-one association between pins and GPIOs ... I'll
repeat the previous example of OMAP1, where certain GPIOs could come out on
any of several pins. And where some pins can be muxed to work with more
than one GPIO (but only one at a time, of course). Clearly, neither pin
refcounting nor GPIO claiming can be sufficient to prevent such problems ...
So, you're saying that if GPIOA1 can come out on pins ZZ1 and BB6, then
there would be two unique "GPIO numbers", one for each possibility?
b.g.
--
Bill Gatliff
[email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
