Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls

David Brownell wrote:

I could certainly take all that feedback and let it lead me to some particular
implementation -- example, a table of { controller, index, flags } structs indexed
by the GPIO numbers, with controller ops vectors matching the primitives -- but
even if that were to happen, I'd like to know if anyone has any major disagreement
with the summary above.

Your summary agrees with me.


b.g.

--
Bill Gatliff
[email protected]

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
    • From: Bill Gatliff <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
    • From: Paul Mundt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix "&& 0x03" obvious typo in net1080
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] backlight: do not power off backlight when unregistering
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
• Next by thread: Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]