Hi,
Mark Rustad schrieb:
There is a better way. Simply implement fork(). It can be done even
without an MMU. People think it is impossible, but that is only because
they don't consider the possibility of copying memory back and forth on
task switch. It sounds horrible, but in the vast majority of cases,
either the parent or child either exits or does an exec pretty quickly,
so in reality it doesn't cost much. The benefits are many: being able to
use real shells such as bash and thereby being able to use real shell
scripts.
This imposes quite a significant overhead for the common case (in which
the application has specifically requested that the parent process be
terminated after the child process is fork()ed off). Even if the cost of
transferring memory contents was cheap (which it isn't), you'd annoy the
memory management subsystem unless you did a lot of weird tricks to
avoid allocating from a large block.
You do have to look out for any applications that fork and do not either
exit or exec, but that is so much better than having to modify so many
things just to get them to run.
Well, in fact just having a libc that does not define a symbol for
"fork" and then going to the places the linker mentions as having
undefined references is a pretty easy way. Mind you, in 90% of cases you
can replace them by a vfork() and be done.
Simon
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
