Re: [PATCH 0/4] WorkStruct: Shrink work_struct by two thirds

[Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>]

On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 14:27 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> 
> The workqueue struct is huge, and this limits it's usefulness.  On a 64-bit
> architecture it's nearly 100 bytes in size, of which the timer_list is half.
> These patches shrink work_struct by 8 of the 12 words it ordinarily consumes.
> This is done by:
> 
>  (1) Splitting the timer out so that delayable work items are defined by a
>      separate structure which incorporates a basic work_struct and a timer.

Why not simply add a timer argument to 'queue_delayed_work()' and
'cancel_delayed_work()'? That may allow you to reuse an existing timer
struct if you already have it embedded somewhere else.

Cheers
  Trond

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/