On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Is there no suitable header file to put this in?
There is only a single file that uses sighand_cachep apart from where it
was defined. If we would add it to signal.h then we would also have to
add an include for slab.h just for this statement. I cannot imagine
any reason why one would have to use sighand_cachep outside of those two
files.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]