Re: [PATCH] serial: Use real irq on UART0 (IRQ = 0) on PPC4xx systems

On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:54:32 +0100 (MET)
Stefan Roese <[email protected]> wrote:
> Let's see, if I got this right. You mean that on such a platform, where 0 is a 
> valid physical IRQ, we should assign another value as virtual IRQ number (not 
> 0 and not -1 of course). And then the platform "pic" implementation should 
> take care of the remapping of these virtual IRQ numbers to the physical 
> numbers.
> 
> Correct?

Absolutely correct in all the detail.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] serial: Use real irq on UART0 (IRQ = 0) on PPC4xx systems
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] serial: Use real irq on UART0 (IRQ = 0) on PPC4xx systems
    • From: Stefan Roese <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] serial: Use real irq on UART0 (IRQ = 0) on PPC4xx systems
    • From: Alan <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] serial: Use real irq on UART0 (IRQ = 0) on PPC4xx systems
    • From: Stefan Roese <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] AF_UNIX recv/shutdown race
• Next by Date: [PATCH] PCMCIA identification strings for cards manufactured by Elan
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] serial: Use real irq on UART0 (IRQ = 0) on PPC4xx systems
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] serial: Use real irq on UART0 (IRQ = 0) on PPC4xx systems
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]