Re: 2.6.19-rc5: lockdep warnings starting irattach

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:

> The comment at the nesting lock says:
> 
> 	/* Careful for priority inversions here !
> 	 * irlmp->links is never taken while another IrDA
> 	 * spinlock is held, so we are safe. Jean II */
> 
> So, under the assumption the author was right, it just needs a lockdep
> annotation.
> 
> (depends on patches in -mm for spin_lock_irqsave_nested())
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux