* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> The comment at the nesting lock says:
>
> /* Careful for priority inversions here !
> * irlmp->links is never taken while another IrDA
> * spinlock is held, so we are safe. Jean II */
>
> So, under the assumption the author was right, it just needs a lockdep
> annotation.
>
> (depends on patches in -mm for spin_lock_irqsave_nested())
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]