Re: [PATCH 1/4] swsusp: Untangle thaw_processes

Hi!

> Ah, good idea.  In fact I prefer if (is_user_space(p) == !thaw_user_space),
> because it will work even if thaw_user_space is different to 1 and 0.
> 
> Revised patch follows.
> 
> ---
> Move the loop from thaw_processes() to a separate function and call it
> independently for kernel threads and user space processes so that the order
> of thawing tasks is clearly visible.
> 
> Drop thaw_kernel_threads() which is never used.

ACK.

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/4] swsusp cleanups
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 1/4] swsusp: Untangle thaw_processes
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/4] swsusp: Untangle thaw_processes
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/4] swsusp: Untangle thaw_processes
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/4] swsusp: Untangle freeze_processes
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] cpufreq: mark cpufreq_tsc() as core_initcall_sync
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/4] swsusp: Untangle thaw_processes
• Next by thread: [PATCH 3/4] swsusp: Fix coding style in suspend.c
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]