On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 22:43 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> As fasteoi type chips never had to define their ack() method before the
> recent Ingo's change to handle_fasteoi_irq(), any attempt to execute handler
> in thread resulted in the kernel crash. So, define their ack() methods to be
> the same as their eoi() ones...
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <[email protected]>
>
> ---
> Since there was no feedback on three solutions I suggested, I'm going the way
> of least resistance and making the fasteoi type chips behave the way that
> handle_fasteoi_irq() is expecting from them...
Wait wait wait .... Can somebody (Ingo ?) explain me why the fasteoi
handler is being changed and what is the rationale for adding an ack
that was not necessary before ?
Cheers,
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
