Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > because people point to the suspend-to-disk instead.
> 
> Who they?

Like you _just_ did.

> >  - enable PM_DEBUG, and PM_TRACE
> 
> This only works on i386, no?

Right now the trivial functions are only available on i386, yes. The 
concept works anywhere that has a CMOS chip, so if somebody were to spend 
a few minutes testing it on x86-64 and others, it would work elsewhere 
too..

> I don't know of anyone who's doing that.

I know. I'm probably the only one. Frustrating.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux