Re: [2.6 patch] mark pci_find_device() as __deprecated

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>]

On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 05:24:21PM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 03:06:00PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 
> > unmaintained != not used
> > 
> > As an example, some people might be unhappy if the floppy driver that is 
> > unmaintained for ages and not in a good state was removed.
> 
> I understand. However, if it was slated to be removed, said people
> might be inclined to start maintaining it.

Most Linux users weren't able to maintain any peace of kernel code even 
if they wanted to.

> We have a bar for inclusion
> of new code into the tree - why shouldn't a quality bar also be
> applied to old code in the tree?

Removing an older unmaintained but working driver is from a user's point 
of view a regression that locks this user into using an older kernel.

> Cheers,
> Muli

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/