On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 11:58:14AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Saturday 18 November 2006 11:55, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > Andi Kleen writes:
> >
> > > On Friday 17 November 2006 23:59, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > >
> > > > + * Copyright (c) 2006-2007 Vivek Goyal ([email protected])
> > >
> > > Normally it's not ok to take sole copyright on code that you mostly copied ...
> >
> > Is this a case where the original had no copyright notice? If so,
> > what do you suggest Vivek should have done?
>
> The head.S code this was copied from definitely had a copyright.
>
I am sorry but I am completely unaware of the details of Copyright
information. Somebody please tell me what should be the right info
here given that basically I have taken the code from
arch/x86_64/boot/head.S, picked modifications done by Eric and minor
changes of my own.
Do I copy here all the copyright info of head.S and then add Eric's
name and mine too?
Thanks
Vivek
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
