Re: [rfc patch] Re: sched: incorrect argument used in task_hot()

* Chen, Kenneth W <[email protected]> wrote:

> -	if (sd->nr_balance_failed > sd->cache_nice_tries)
> +	if (sd->nr_balance_failed > sd->cache_nice_tries) {
> +		#ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
> +		if (task_hot(p, rq->most_recent_timestamp, sd))
> +			schedstat_inc(sd, lb_hot_gained[idle]);
> +		#endif
>  		return 1;
> +	}

minor nit: preprocessor directives should be aligned to the first 
column.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [rfc patch] Re: sched: incorrect argument used in task_hot()
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
  • RE: [rfc patch] Re: sched: incorrect argument used in task_hot()
    • From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Regard MSRs in lapic_suspend()/lapic_resume()
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 20/20] x86_64: Move CPU verification code to common file
• Previous by thread: RE: [rfc patch] Re: sched: incorrect argument used in task_hot()
• Next by thread: dead? irq nforce chipset
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]