Re: [patch 2.6.19-rc6] platform_driver_probe(), can save codespace

On Friday 17 November 2006 11:11 am, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

> Do we discard __init sections in modules nowadays? I thought we did
> that only for the kernel image itself.

When did we _not_ discard them for modules?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 2.6.19-rc6] platform_driver_probe(), can save codespace
    • From: "Dmitry Torokhov" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 2.6.19-rc6] platform_driver_probe(), can save codespace
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 2.6.19-rc6] platform_driver_probe(), can save codespace
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 2.6.19-rc6] platform_driver_probe(), can save codespace
    • From: "Dmitry Torokhov" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: We're still coping with GCC < 3.0
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.19-rc5 nasty ACPI regression, AE_TIME errors
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 2.6.19-rc6] platform_driver_probe(), can save codespace
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 2.6.19-rc6] platform_driver_probe(), can save codespace
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]