Re : vm: weird behaviour when munmapping

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[me moving to Gmail 'cause yahoo sucks !]

On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 14:12 +0000, moreau francis wrote:
Peter Zijlstra wrote:

The new object is the one allocated using:
	new = kmem_cache_alloc(vm_area_cachep, SLAB_KERNEL);


Of course but at this point the choice of the new VMA is already made
by the caller. So in our case do_munmap() decided that B is the new
one as you said. But I still don't see why...

And as I said previously it will end up by calling consecutively:

       vma->vm_ops->open(B)
       vma->vm_ops->close(B)


Please read Mel Gorman's book on memory management to gain a better
understanding.

http://www.phptr.com/bookstore/product.asp?isbn=0131453483&rl=1

thanks for the link, but I don't expect to find out the answer to this
very specific question in it.

Francis
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux