On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 10:59:07 +0100
Mikael Pettersson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton writes:
> > On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:55:46 +0100
> > Mikael Pettersson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Andrew Morton writes:
> > > > Surely the appropriate behaviour is to allow oprofile to steal the NMI and
> > > > to then put the NMI back to doing the watchdog thing after oprofile has
> > > > finished with it.
> > >
> > > Which is _exactly_ what pre-2.6.19-rc1 kernels did. I implemented
> > > the in-kernel API allowing real performance counter drivers like
> > > oprofile (and perfctr) to claim the HW from the NMI watchdog,
> > > do their work, and then release it which resumed the watchdog.
> >
> > OK. But from Andi's comments it seems that the NMI watchdog was failing to
> > resume its operation.
>
> It certainly worked when I originally implemented it. If it didn't work
> that way before 2.6.19-rc1 butchered it then that would have been a bug
> that should have been fixed.
Oh. OK.
Meanwhile, 2.6.19-rc6 remains unfixed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
