On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:17:18PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Heh. That was the original implementation by Uri. I felt that was
> wrong because _IOW() encodes the size in the ioctl number, bit the
> actual size is different.
That really shouldn't be a problem. After all the pointer approach
doesn't encode the transfered size either. Given that the variable
sized array gives a much cleaner interface you should use it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
