* Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Did you look at the BKL reacquire issue I sent? Just looking over
> > > the code briefly, it looks like it's still there.
> >
> > yeah, will do that. It's quite low-prio, evidently no-one in the past
> > couple of months even attempted to build a !PREEMPT_RT && !PREEMPT_BKL
> > (!) kernel.
>
> doh - i have re-read your report and the problem should hit PREEMPT_RT
> too. I'm looking at it.
actually, it should only hit CONFIG_SPINLOCK_BKL, which is an option
no-one should be using these days. I'll disable that option for now.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
