Re: sleeping functions called in invalid context during resume

> > I have no idea what causes:
> > 
> > APIC error on CPU0: 00(00)
> > 
> > Is it an ACPI problem?

What CPU/chipset?

> 
> Strange.  x86_64 has that stray exit_idle() in smp_error_interrupt() but
> afaict it won't cause this to happen.
> 
> What's that idle_notifier doing in x86_64 anyway?  

I originally added it for my (now abandoned in favour of dyntick) noidletick 
implementation. I would have removed it again, but perfmon plans to use it
too and I suspect dyntick will too (?)

> It appears to have no 
> users.  If there _is_ a user, and if its IDLE_END handler is altering the
> preempt-count then perhaps there's your explanation.

There shouldn't be a user currently in tree.
 
> But it all appears to be dead code to me.

Right now it is yes.

-Andi
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • sleeping functions called in invalid context during resume
    • From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
  • Re: sleeping functions called in invalid context during resume
    • From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
  • Re: sleeping functions called in invalid context during resume
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Looking for recent lkml email
• Next by Date: Re: changing internal kernel system mechanism in runtime by a module patch
• Previous by thread: Re: sleeping functions called in invalid context during resume
• Next by thread: Re: sleeping functions called in invalid context during resume
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]