Re: changing internal kernel system mechanism in runtime by a module patch

On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:19:50PM +0200, Yitzchak Eidus wrote:

> is it possible to replace linux kernel internal functions such as
> schdule () to lets say my_schdule () in a run time with a module
> patch???  (so that every call in the kernel to schdule() will go to
> my_schdule()... ) ???

Not in Linux.

> i am talking about a clean/standard way to do such thing
> (without overwrite the mem address of the function and replace it in a
> dirty way...)

k42 supports "dynamic hot-swap" and there's been some work done to
bring it into Linux, see e.g.,
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/k42-discussion/2006-October/001615.html.

Cheers,
Muli


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: changing internal kernel system mechanism in runtime by a module patch
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

• References:
  • changing internal kernel system mechanism in runtime by a module patch
    • From: "Yitzchak Eidus" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] input: make serio_register_driver() return error code
• Next by Date: Re: Looking for recent lkml email
• Previous by thread: Re: changing internal kernel system mechanism in runtime by a module patch
• Next by thread: Re: changing internal kernel system mechanism in runtime by a module patch
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]