memory hotplug function redefinition/confusion

[Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>]

2.6.19-rc5-mm2:

include/linux/memory_hotplug.h uses CONFIG_NUMA to decide:

#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
extern int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start);
#else
static inline int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
{
	return 0;
}
#endif

but mm/init.c uses CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA to decide:

#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
{
	return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(memory_add_physaddr_to_nid);
#endif

#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
{
	return 0;
}
#endif

(sic: duplicate function above)

The CONFIG_NUMA vs. CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA seems to cause this build error:

  CC      arch/x86_64/mm/init.o
arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:501: error: redefinition of 'memory_add_physaddr_to_nid'
include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:71: error: previous definition of 'memory_add_phys
addr_to_nid' was here
arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:509: error: redefinition of 'memory_add_physaddr_to_nid'
arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:501: error: previous definition of 'memory_add_physaddr_to_
nid' was here
make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/mm/init.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/x86_64/mm] Error 2

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/