Re: changing internal kernel system mechanism in runtime by a module patch

On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:19:50PM +0200, Yitzchak Eidus wrote:
> is it possible to replace linux kernel internal functions such as
> schdule () to lets say my_schdule ()  in a run time with a module
> patch???
> (so that every call in the kernel to schdule() will go to my_schdule()... ) 
> ???
> 
> i am talking about a clean/standard way to do such thing
> (without overwrite the mem address of the function and replace it in a
> dirty way...)

No.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: changing internal kernel system mechanism in runtime by a module patch
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

• References:
  • changing internal kernel system mechanism in runtime by a module patch
    • From: "Yitzchak Eidus" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: changing internal kernel system mechanism in runtime by a module patch
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/13] Linux RDMA Core Changes
• Previous by thread: changing internal kernel system mechanism in runtime by a module patch
• Next by thread: Re: changing internal kernel system mechanism in runtime by a module patch
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]