Karl MacMillan <[email protected]> wrote: > > and the race in which the rules might change is still a > > possibility I have to deal with. > > I don't think this is a race, it is revocation of access. If you check the > access at every operation and correctly deal with access failures, then this > shouldn't be a problem. Yes it is a pain, but that is how SELinux is supposed > to work. Yes, but what is the correct method of dealing with a failure? All I can think of is to SIGKILL the process. David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 12/19] CacheFiles: Permit a process's create SID to be overridden
- From: Karl MacMillan <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 12/19] CacheFiles: Permit a process's create SID to be overridden
- From: James Morris <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 12/19] CacheFiles: Permit a process's create SID to be overridden
- From: James Morris <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 00/19] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 12/19] CacheFiles: Permit a process's create SID to be overridden
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 12/19] CacheFiles: Permit a process's create SID to be overridden
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 12/19] CacheFiles: Permit a process's create SID to be overridden
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 12/19] CacheFiles: Permit a process's create SID to be overridden
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.18 - AHCI detection pauses excessively
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386-pda UP optimization
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 12/19] CacheFiles: Permit a process's create SID to be overridden
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 12/19] CacheFiles: Permit a process's create SID to be overridden
- Index(es):
 |