Re: sleeping functions called in invalid context during resume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:33:54 +0100
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> * Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > >  [<ffffffff80215059>] vfs_write+0xce/0x174
> > >  [<ffffffff802159a5>] sys_write+0x45/0x6e
> > >  [<ffffffff802593de>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
> > > DWARF2 unwinder stuck at system_call+0x7e/0x83
> > > 
> > > Leftover inexact backtrace:
> > 
> > Could mean that someone somewhere forgot to release a spinlock.
> > 
> > Ingo had a patch which would find the culprit (preempt-tracing.patch).
> > 
> > Does it still live?
> 
> if it's really a spinlock/rwlock release that was missed, then i've got 
> good news: we already have that debugging infrastructure, it's called 
> lockdep :-)
> 
> The patch below makes use of that capability of lockdep for all 
> stackdumps that are printed to the console. Stephen, please apply this 
> patch, enable CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING and try to trigger another message. 
> 
> 	Ingo

I tried but with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING, resume gets stuck in an infinite
loop backtracing to the console.  Unfortunately, the serial console isn't up
at that point so it it isn't capturable. 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux