Re: [PATCH] x86: fix MTRR code

>I also got one reject in generic.c for
>
>-       if (base + size < 0x100) {
>+       if (base < 0x100) {
>
>but I hope that's ok

Hmm, not really - it applied cleanly on 2.6.19-rc5.

Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] x86: fix MTRR code
    • From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] x86: fix MTRR code
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Yet another borken page_count() check in invalidate_inode_pages2()....
• Next by Date: Re: [discuss] Re: 2.6.19-rc5: known regressions (v3)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix MTRR code
• Next by thread: netlink messages on ARP events
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]