On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> The snd-hda-intel driver has a test of MSI, but it seems not working
> on every machine. It caused non-cared interrupts and the kernel
> disabled that irq.
Yes.
Btw, this was why I was claiming that maybe some devices might raise
_both_ the MSI and the INTx interrupt, which can indeed cause problems
like that: because we see spurious interrupts on some other irq line (the
INTx one), we might decide to end up disabling that one, just because we
can't seem to shut it up.
However, the same kind of schenario may happen if the MSI irq from a
device simply doesn't _work_ - the device may claim MSI capabilities but
always uses INTx, and you'd get the same behaviour from just _testing_ the
MSI line - the irq comes in on the wrong vector, and since you're not
handling that vector, the kernel has no choice but to say "I will have to
disable this screaming irq".
So "testing" that an MSI works isn't actually goign to solve any real
problems. It may or may not show that the MSI works, but regardless of the
success of the test, it can have deadly consequences for _other_ devices
if the irq routing (which may be INTx) is broken.
This is why I'm so adamant that we need to _know_ that it works before we
use it. When irq's get mis-routed, things go downhill real fast. We're
usually talking "dead machines", and there is very little that a driver
can do about it.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]