David Howells wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
index 5ead2bf..b2e5e86 100644
--- a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
@@ -205,6 +205,7 @@ #define NFS_INO_REVALIDATING (0) /* rev
#define NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS (1) /* advise readdirplus */
#define NFS_INO_STALE (2) /* possible stale inode */
#define NFS_INO_ACL_LRU_SET (3) /* Inode is on the LRU list */
+#define NFS_INO_CACHEABLE (4) /* inode can be cached by FS-Cache */
static inline struct nfs_inode *NFS_I(struct inode *inode)
{
@@ -230,6 +231,7 @@ #define NFS_ATTRTIMEO_UPDATE(inode) (NFS
#define NFS_FLAGS(inode) (NFS_I(inode)->flags)
#define NFS_STALE(inode) (test_bit(NFS_INO_STALE, &NFS_FLAGS(inode)))
+#define NFS_CACHEABLE(inode) (test_bit(NFS_INO_CACHEABLE, &NFS_FLAGS(inode)))
A small nit..
To stay with the coding style NFS uses, could you please changes
these variables to:
+#define NFS_INO_FSCACHE (4) /* inode can be cached by FS-Cache */
and
+#define NFS_FSCACHE(inode) (test_bit(NFS_INO_FSCACHE, &NFS_FLAGS(inode))
steved.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
