I mistakenly wrote sas_ata_qc_issue to return error codes such as
ENOMEM. Since libata OR's qc->err_mask with the return value, I believe
that it is necessary to make my code return one of the AC_ERR_ codes.
For now I'm using AC_ERR_SYSTEM because an error here means that the
command couldn't be sent to the controller. Patch is against jejb's
aic94xx-sas tree.
If anybody has a suggestion for a better AC_ERR_ code to use, please
suggest it.
--
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
index 47fb274..9208b8b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static void sas_ata_task_done(struct sas
static unsigned int sas_ata_qc_issue(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
{
- int res = -ENOMEM;
+ int res;
struct sas_task *task;
struct domain_device *dev = qc->ap->private_data;
struct sas_ha_struct *sas_ha = dev->port->ha;
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static unsigned int sas_ata_qc_issue(str
task = sas_alloc_task(GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!task)
- goto out;
+ return AC_ERR_SYSTEM;
task->dev = dev;
task->task_proto = SAS_PROTOCOL_STP;
task->task_done = sas_ata_task_done;
@@ -187,12 +187,10 @@ static unsigned int sas_ata_qc_issue(str
SAS_DPRINTK("lldd_execute_task returned: %d\n", res);
sas_free_task(task);
- if (res == -SAS_QUEUE_FULL)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ return AC_ERR_SYSTEM;
}
-out:
- return res;
+ return 0;
}
static u8 sas_ata_check_status(struct ata_port *ap)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
