Re: How to cleanly shut down a block device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pierre Ossman wrote:
> How about this patch? It is basically the same as the previous, but it
> also sets queuedata to NULL and tests for that. It does not address if
> someone still has dependencies on the queue but hasn't gotten itself a
> reference (as I haven't gotten any word on if that is a problem):

Ok, I've done some more digging through the block layer. A lot of voodoo
in there, but gendisk seems to make sure it has its own reference to the
queue.

As gendisk drops it reference to the queue in del_gendisk(), I have to
assume that is would be invalid for any part of kernel to look at
disk->queue at this point (since it might now have been released).

So I think this patch should cover all bases. It cleanly kills of our
extra thread and also handles any requests that might be left behind.

I hope you can look at this soon as I'm eager to get rid of this oops.

Rgds

-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  Linux kernel, MMC maintainer        http://www.kernel.org
  PulseAudio, core developer          http://pulseaudio.org
  rdesktop, core developer          http://www.rdesktop.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux