On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:13:47 +0300
Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]> wrote:
> OOM can panic due to the processes stuck in __alloc_pages()
> doing infinite rebalance loop while no memory can be reclaimed.
> OOM killer tries to kill some processes, but unfortunetaly,
> rebalance label was moved by someone below the TIF_MEMDIE check,
> so buddy allocator doesn't see that process is OOM-killed
> and it can simply fail the allocation :/
>
> Observed in reality on RHEL4(2.6.9)+OpenVZ kernel when a user doing
> some memory allocation tricks triggered OOM panic.
>
> Signed-Off-By: Denis Lunev <[email protected]>
> Signed-Off-By: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
>
> --- ./mm/page_alloc.c.oomx 2006-11-08 17:44:16.000000000 +0300
> +++ ./mm/page_alloc.c 2006-11-13 21:57:33.000000000 +0300
> @@ -1251,6 +1251,7 @@ restart:
>
> /* This allocation should allow future memory freeing. */
>
> +rebalance:
> if (((p->flags & PF_MEMALLOC) || unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE)))
> && !in_interrupt()) {
> if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOMEMALLOC)) {
> @@ -1272,7 +1273,6 @@ nofail_alloc:
> if (!wait)
> goto nopage;
>
> -rebalance:
> cond_resched();
>
> /* We now go into synchronous reclaim */
Your patch reverts a change made by Nick's
a457c255ae59b5f7f52f63fc88d5e530101772c6 two years ago.
It looks right to me, but the original change was unchangelogged and I
wonder what it was aiming to do?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
