Neil Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> it would appear that in:
> if (inode->i_sb && inode->i_sb->s_op->clear_inode)
> inode->i_sb->s_op->clear_inode(inode);
>
> inode->i_sb->s_op is NULL.
Agreed.
> This tends to suggest that generic_shutdown_super isn't releasing all inodes
> before the superblock gets destroyed.
>
> I cannot see how this could be happening
Perhaps sb->s_root == NULL? That would permit most of generic_shutdown_super()
to be bypassed, including the check that all the inodes have been consumed.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
