On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 10:59 -0500, Patrick McFarland wrote:
> On Sunday 12 November 2006 10:21, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 03:16:38PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > > > We KNOW it can't work on a sizable amount of machines. This is why
> > > > > it is a config option; you can enable it if YOUR machine is KNOWN to
> > > > > work, and you get some gains. But it's also understood that it often
> > > > > it won't work. So any sensible distro (since they have to aim for a
> > > > > wide audience) disables this option ...
> > > >
> > > > Nowadays, many distributions only ship CONFIG_SMP=y kernels...
> > >
> > > that's a calculated risk on their side (and they know that); they're
> > > balancing not functioning on a set of machines off against needing more
> > > kernels.
> >
> > This might soon affect the majority of Linux users, so it's a case that
> > has to be handled...
>
> I actually agree here. Linux needs to be easier for people to use, not harder.
> Isn't there a way for bootloaders or the kernel early on figure out if the
> machine supports SMP, and if it doesnt, load a uniproc kernel instead?
this is what OS installers have been doing for a decade or so.
--
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
