Re: 2.6.19-rc5-mm1 fails to compile with gcc 4.2

'sel' is a variable, so gcc can't provide it as an immediate operand. Specifying it as "rm" instead of "g" would have been better, but can't have any real influence.

It can become an immediate operand if the function
gets inlined into a caller.


Segher

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • 2.6.19-rc5-mm1 fails to compile with gcc 4.2
    • From: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.19-rc5-mm1 fails to compile with gcc 4.2
    • From: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.19-rc5-mm1 fails to compile with gcc 4.2
    • From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.19-rc5-mm1 fails to compile with gcc 4.2
    • From: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.19-rc5-mm1 fails to compile with gcc 4.2
    • From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.19-rc5-mm1 fails to compile with gcc 4.2
• Next by Date: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7495] New: Kernel periodically hangs.
• Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.19-rc5-mm1 fails to compile with gcc 4.2
• Next by thread: Re: 2.6.19-rc5-mm1 fails to compile with gcc 4.2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]