On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> So designate only one CPU within a domain to do load balance between groups
> for that specific sched domain should in theory fix the 2nd problem you
> identified. Did you get a chance to look at the patch Suresh posted?
Yes, I am still thinking about how this would work. This would mean that
the first cpu on a system would move busy processes to itself from all
1023 other processes? That does not sound appealing.
Processes in the allnodes domain would move to processor #0. The next
lower layer are the nodes groups. Not all of the groups at that layer
contain processor #0. So we would never move processes into those sched
domains?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
