Re: [patch 01/19] hrtimers: state tracking

On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 01:40 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > ok so it IS a bit thing, see comment about hrtimer_is_queued() not being
> > a bit check then...
> > 
> 
> eek.  I exhaustively went over that confusion in my initial (and lengthy)
> review of these patches.
> 
> I don't think we ever saw a point-by-point reply.  What got lost?

I added comments in the defines and in the code as you requested.
Obviously not enough comments.

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 00/21] Highres / dynticks drop in replacement for 2.6.19-rc5-mm1
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • [patch 01/19] hrtimers: state tracking
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 01/19] hrtimers: state tracking
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 01/19] hrtimers: state tracking
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Make the NUMA hash function nodemap allocation dynamic and remove NODEMAPSIZE
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add dev_sysdata and use it for ACPI
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 01/19] hrtimers: state tracking
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 01/19] hrtimers: state tracking
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]