On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 06:10 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > verify_tsc_freq_timer.function = verify_tsc_freq;
> > > verify_tsc_freq_timer.expires =
> >
> >
> > Hmmm. I wish this patch was unnecessary, but I don't see an easy
> > solution.
>
> Very sad. This will make a lot of people unhappy, even to the point
> where they might prefer disabling noidlehz over super slow gettimeofday.
> I assume you at least have a suitable command line option for that, right?
Yes it is sad. And the sadest part is that AMD and Intel have been asked
to fix that more than 5 years ago. They did not get their brain straight
and now we are the dimwits.
> Can we get a summary on which systems the TSC is considered unstable?
> Normally we assume if it's stable enough for gettimeofday it should
> be stable enough for longer delays too.
TSC is simply a nightmare:
- Frequency changes with CPU clock
- Unsynced across CPUs
- Stops in C3, which makes it completely unusable
Once you take away periodic interrupts it is simply broken. AMD and
Intel can run in circels, it does not get better.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
