Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fix lock inversion aio_kick_handler()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



==> On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 19:02:23 -0700, Zach Brown <[email protected]> said:

Zach> Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
Zach> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 05:10:32PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
Zach> >> Fix lock inversion aio_kick_handler()
Zach> > 
Zach> > Doh.  Unfortunately, this patch isn't entirely correct as it
Zach> could race with > __put_ioctx() which sets ioctx->mm = NULL.

Zach> Aha, yeah, that's what I was missing.  Thanks.

Zach> > Something like the following should do the trick:

Zach> Cool, I'll respin and send it out.

Did you ever resend this patch, Zach?  It doesn't appear to be in
current kernels.  I'm still running into the lockdep warnings.

-Jeff

--- linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm1/fs/aio.c.orig	2006-11-09 17:28:43.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm1/fs/aio.c	2006-11-09 17:29:29.000000000 -0500
@@ -864,13 +864,15 @@ static void aio_kick_handler(void *data)
 	struct kioctx *ctx = data;
 	mm_segment_t oldfs = get_fs();
 	int requeue;
+	struct mm_struct *mm;
 
 	set_fs(USER_DS);
 	use_mm(ctx->mm);
 	spin_lock_irq(&ctx->ctx_lock);
 	requeue =__aio_run_iocbs(ctx);
- 	unuse_mm(ctx->mm);
+	mm = ctx->mm;
 	spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->ctx_lock);
+ 	unuse_mm(mm);
 	set_fs(oldfs);
 	/*
 	 * we're in a worker thread already, don't use queue_delayed_work,
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux