> What if the quality of the bug report is good and the submitter is > responsive, and there's still zero reaction? > > Let's make an example: > > Since the first list I sent immediately after 2.6.19-rc1 was released, > kernel Bugzilla #7255 is part of my list of 2.6.19-rc regressions but > has gotten exactly zero developer responses. where was the lkml mail for this? > > What exactly were the mistakes of the submitter resulting in noone > caring about Bugzilla #7255? he didn't post to lkml? -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
- References:
- A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
- From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>
- Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] x86_64: Fix partial page check to ensure unusable memory is not being marked usable.
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19 5/5] fs: freeze_bdev with semaphore not mutex
- Previous by thread: Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
- Next by thread: Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
- Index(es):