Re: locking hierarchy based on lockdep

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> 
> * Jason Baron <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > You are right though, i think that the data in the locks after lists 
> > is sufficient to re-create the entire graph, since its acyclic, but by 
> > simply printing out nodes of distance '1', the algorithm is greatly 
> > simplified. Otherwise, i'd have to first reconstruct the graph...
> 
> but ... the locks_after list should really only include locks that are 
> taken immediately after. I.e. there should only be 'distance 1' locks.
> 

hmmm...that's not how i read the lockdep code...and the little piece of 
code that i added to add a distance measurement to links, found mostly 
distance 1 links but there were a number of 2 and 3 links as well (i don't 
think i saw any greater than 3).

thanks.

-Jason
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux