Igor A. Valcov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For one of our projects we have a test program that measures file
> system performance by writing up to 1000 files simultaneously. After
> installing kernel v2.6.16 we noticed that XFS performance dropped by a
> factor of 5 (tests that took around 4 minutes on kernel 2.6.15 now
> take around 20 minutes to complete).
Ouch.
> We then checked all kernels
> starting from 2.6.16 up to 2.6.19-rc5 with the same unpleasant result.
> The funny thing about all this is that we chose XFS for that
> particular project specifically because it was about 5 times faster
> with the tests than the other file systems. Now they all take about
> the same time.
>
> I also noticed that I/O barriers were introduced in v2.6.16 and
> thought they may be the cause, but mounting the file system with
> 'nobarrier' doesn't seem to affect the performance in any way.
>
> Any thoughts on the matter are appreciated.
Can you provide the test?
-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
