On Thu, 9 Nov 2006 07:57:48 +0300
Al Boldi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 11:40:27PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > Let me make one very clear statement first: -stabel is a GREAT think
> > > and it is working VERY well.
> > > That being said, many of the fixes I see going into -stable are
> > > regression fixes. Maybe not the majority, but still, regression fixes
> > > going into -stable tells me that the kernel should have seen more
> > > testing/bugfixing before being declared a stable release.
> >
> > Nice theory, but of course I'm pretty sure that it wouldn't work
>
> Agreed.
>
> > (as has been said numerous time before by other people).
> >
> > You cannot do endless testing/bugfixing, it's a psychological issue.
>
> Agreed.
>
> > If you do that, then you end up with -preXX (or worse, -preXXX)
> > version numbers, which would cause too many people to wait and wait
> > and wait with upgrading until "that next stable" kernel version
> > finally becomes available.
> > IOW, your tester base erodes, awfully, and development progress stalls.
>
> IMHO, the psycho-problem is that you cannot intertwine development and stable
> in the same cycle. In that respect, the 2.6 development cycle is a real
> flop, as it does not allow for focus.
>
> And focus is needed to achieve stability.
>
> Think catch22...
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Al
There are bugfixes which are too big for stable or -rc releases, that are
queued for 2.6.20. "Bugfix only" is a relative statement. Do you include,
new hardware support, new security api's, performance fixes. It gets to
be real hard to decide, because these are the changes that often cause
regressions; often one major bug fix causes two minor bugs.
Interestingly, adding a new feature often causes no bugs in the rest
of the code, but it does increase the possible bug surface so most of
the problems related to feature X are bugs in feature X.
--
Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]