Re: Abysmal PATA IDE performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Arjan van de Ven wrote:

Probably your drives are renamed.
Before you had (wild guess, look at your boot log messages):
- ata bus -> hdc,hdd
- sata -> sda (if you really have any sata bus...)

Now all hdX become sdX, and PATA is detected _before_ SATA, so you names
probaly became:
- ata via libata -> sda (HD), sr0 (CDROM)
- sata -> sdb.

on fedora this doesn't matter (due to mount-by-label)

the bigger problem I suspect is that the sata modules aren't part of the
initrd!

you can force the issue by adding

alias scsi_hostadapter1 ata_piix

to the /etc/modprobe.conf file, and then recreating the initrd
(see the mkinitrd tool, or just install the kernel rpm)




Thanks all.

Arjan, using combined_mode=libata and making a new ramdisk increased my xfer rate from 1.xx mb/sec to 28.xx mb/sec.

I am curious as to why my friends dell inspiron 8200 with a 1.8ghz p4 and the same drive using the same drive with FC6 and the standard ide module gets 44 to 45 mb/sec.

Steve

--

"They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin)

"The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases." (Thomas Jefferson)



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux