Re: [PATCH] ipmi_si_intf.c: fix "&& 0xff" typos

On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:15:46 CST, Corey Minyard said:
> Ouch, I guess we've never had a system with these address types.  Thanks.

If we never had a system with these address types..

> >  static unsigned char intf_mem_inw(struct si_sm_io *io, unsigned int offset)
> >  {
> >  	return (readw((io->addr)+(offset * io->regspacing)) >> io->regshift)
> > -		&& 0xff;
> > +		& 0xff;
> >  }

Is this dead code that isn't called by anybody?

Attachment: pgp5OrXHMFRmi.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] ipmi_si_intf.c: fix "&& 0xff" typos
    • From: Corey Minyard <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] ipmi_si_intf.c: fix "&& 0xff" typos
    • From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] ipmi_si_intf.c: fix "&& 0xff" typos
    • From: Corey Minyard <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: New laptop - problems with linux
• Next by Date: Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] ipmi_si_intf.c: fix "&& 0xff" typos
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] ipmi_si_intf.c: fix "&& 0xff" typos
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]