On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:15:46 CST, Corey Minyard said: > Ouch, I guess we've never had a system with these address types. Thanks. If we never had a system with these address types.. > > static unsigned char intf_mem_inw(struct si_sm_io *io, unsigned int offset) > > { > > return (readw((io->addr)+(offset * io->regspacing)) >> io->regshift) > > - && 0xff; > > + & 0xff; > > } Is this dead code that isn't called by anybody?
Attachment:
pgp5OrXHMFRmi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] ipmi_si_intf.c: fix "&& 0xff" typos
- From: Corey Minyard <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] ipmi_si_intf.c: fix "&& 0xff" typos
- References:
- [PATCH] ipmi_si_intf.c: fix "&& 0xff" typos
- From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] ipmi_si_intf.c: fix "&& 0xff" typos
- From: Corey Minyard <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] ipmi_si_intf.c: fix "&& 0xff" typos
- Prev by Date: Re: New laptop - problems with linux
- Next by Date: Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] ipmi_si_intf.c: fix "&& 0xff" typos
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] ipmi_si_intf.c: fix "&& 0xff" typos
- Index(es):
![]() |