Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.

>
>You *have* to release a new ""stable"" version rather fast (the .0 one)
>so that people will have that "new shiny version, get it while it's hot!"
>feeling and will realize rather quickly that that new version
>is all crap again after all and report their unhappiness.

Or they just silently revert to a kernel that worked.


	-`J'
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
    • From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>
  • Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
    • From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>
  • Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
    • From: Andreas Mohr <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [take23 0/5] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.19-rc5: known regressions
• Previous by thread: Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
• Next by thread: Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]