On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:08:30 -0800
"Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > so... Is this:
> >
> > htirq-refactor-so-we-only-have-one-function-that-writes-to-the-chip.patch
> > htirq-allow-buggy-drivers-of-buggy-hardware-to-write-the-registers.patch
>
> You should drop the above patch from Eric...
>
> > htirq-allow-buggy-drivers-of-buggy-hardware-to-write-the-registers-update.patch
>
> ...in favour of this one, which is my rework of Eric's patch.
>
> > ib-ipath-program-intconfig-register-using-new-ht-irq-hook.patch
If you look, you'll see that the
htirq-allow-buggy-drivers-of-buggy-hardware-to-write-the-registers-update.patch
which I merged is the diff between Eric's patch and yours (ie: the diff
which you should have sent ;))
> > considered 2.6.19 material?
>
> Yes, please. I might be able to simplify the ib-ipath patch (by a
> matter of a few lines), but it works fine as it stands.
>
ho hum, OK.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
