On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 13:36:04 -0800
David Brownell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > +#define EXTERNAL_IRQ_BASE NR_INTERNAL_IRQS
> > +#define NR_EXTERNAL_IRQS 32
> > +#define GPIO_IRQ_BASE (EXTERNAL_IRQ_BASE +
> > NR_EXTERNAL_IRQS) +#define NR_GPIO_IRQS (4 * 32)
> > +
> > +#define NR_IRQS (GPIO_IRQ_BASE +
> > NR_GPIO_IRQS)
>
> Did I miss something, or are the IRQs starting at GPIO_IRQ_BASE
> not actually implemented? There's no irq_chip with name "GPIO"
> or anything. The AT91 code should be almost a drop-in there...
No, you didn't miss anything, but I do want to implement a "GPIO"
irq_chip like at91 does. I suppose I can reduce NR_IRQS a bit until
it happens, but then again it's perhaps better to just implement the
irq_chip thing...
Haavard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
