Re: [take23 0/5] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.

On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 02:17:18PM -0800, Andrew Morton ([email protected]) wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> 
> If kevent_user_wait() gets -EFAULT on the attempt to copy the first event, it
> will return 0, which is indistinguishable from "no events pending".
> 
> It can and should return EFAULT in this case.

Correct, I missed that.
Thanks Andrew, I will put into my tree, -mm seems to have it already.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [take23 0/5] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
    • From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [take23 0/5] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [take23 0/5] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 17/33] usb: hid-core free urb cleanup
• Next by Date: [PATCH 18/33] usb: usbkbd free urb cleanup
• Previous by thread: Re: [take23 0/5] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
• Next by thread: Re: [take23 0/5] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]